Thus declared
the Nazi inspector of Munich city schools in Germany, June 1939. His
words appear in the July 1945 U.S. Office of Strategic Services (OSS)
study “The Nazi Master Plan,” available online in pdf format in four
parts from the “Nuremberg Project” at Rutgers University and the Rutgers
Journal of Law and Religion.
“Implementation
of this objective started with the curtailment of religious instruction
in the primary and secondary schools,” the OSS (forerunner of today’s
Central Intelligence Agency) document continues,
“with the squeezing of the religious periods into inconvenient hours,
with Nazi propaganda among the teachers in order to induce them to
refuse the teaching of religion, with vetoing of…religious text books,
and finally with substituting Nazi Weltanschauung and
‘German Faith’ for Christian religious denominational instruction…. At
the time of the outbreak of the war…religious instruction had
practically disappeared from Germany’s primary schools.”
Adolf
Hitler’s evil attempt to carry out genocide and his mass murder of six
million Jews is recognized as one of history’s greatest crimes against
humanity.
Less
well known, but revealed clearly in this OSS document, was Hitler’s
master plan to destroy Christianity and replace it with his own “German
Faith” concocted from a mixture of occultism, pre-Christian paganism,
racism and National Socialism (whose German words for his political
party contracted into “Nazi”).
Hitler’s regime was bent on “eliminating all
political organizations other than the Nazi party,” the OSS analysis
says. It
was a jealous religion that allowed no other gods but Hitler and no
rival institution that might explicitly or implicitly challenge its
totalitarian authority.
Such
hatred and fear of other religions is a hallmark of socialism. Karl
Marx denounced religion as the “opiate of the masses,” preventing them
from martyring themselves to the cause of Marxist revolution. The
late Soviet Union promoted atheism, then watched its empire start
unraveling in Poland because the Roman Catholic Church and its Polish
Pope commanded vastly more love and loyalty from the people than the
Church of Marx.
In
the Peoples Republic of China the Marxist rulers fearfully persecute a
sect whose simple meditation undermines government control over
peoples’ minds. Communist China days ago imprisoned yet more peasants
in labor camps for the subversive crime of merely possessing Bibles.
Socialists
in the United States, including those who behind the scenes control one
of America’s two biggest political parties, have not yet attained the
degree of power held by their comrades Hitler, Stalin and Mao. But
here, too, their aim is to purge all other religions from the public
square – from public school classrooms to holiday displays – so that
their socialist faith can have a monopoly as our official
government-imposed religion.
“Religion,” as defined by the American Heritage Dictionary,
can be “A cause, principle, or activity pursued with zeal or
conscientious devotion.”
Humanism, as defined by the Oxford English Dictionary
and embraced by socialists from Adolf Hitler to Hillary Clinton, can be
“the Religion of Humanity.” In this nominally-secular Humanist religion
man replaces God as, in the Greek philosopher Protagoras’ phrase, “the
measure of all things.”
The
Western idea of God is not necessarily essential in defining religion.
Buddhism, e.g., has no deity, but few would insist on calling it a
philosophy instead of a religion.
The
United States Federal Government is prohibited by our Constitution’s
First Amendment from making any law “respecting an Establishment of
Religion [i.e., a state church like the Church of England], or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof.”
This
had the effect, wrote the author of our Declaration of Independence and
third President Thomas Jefferson in an 1802 letter to the Danbury
Baptists, of “building a wall of separation between Church and State.”
What did Jefferson mean by this? Part
of the answer appears in his preface to one of the only three things
for which he wished to be remembered on his tombstone, his 1779
Virginia Statute on Religious Freedom.
“To compel a man to furnish contributions of
money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors,”
wrote Jefferson, “is sinful and tyrannical.”
(I
think of this each time I witness National Public Radio (NPR) and the
Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) using my coerced taxes to broadcast
Bill Moyers, an ultra-Leftist who thus has pocketed far more than $20
million taxpayer dollars.)
A
man should not even be forced to support a particular preacher of his
own religious persuasion, Jefferson continued, for to do so would
deprive him “of the comfortable liberty of giving his contributions to
the particular pastor whose morals he would make his pattern, and whose
powers he feels most persuasive to righteousness….”
Jefferson
believed that religion should be something between a person and his or
her God and that government should not interfere here.
“It
does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods or no
god,” wrote Jefferson in 1785. “It neither picks my pocket nor breaks
my leg.”
For
most of two centuries this separation of church and state helped
America avoid the religious wars that killed millions in Europe and
elsewhere.
But the Left has broken that peace. It
has done so by violating another key tenant of the Jeffersonian ideal –
that government should remain very, very small, thereby leaving almost
the entire public square open to each person’s free exercise of
religion.
The
Left has invoked a new syllogism – that church and state must be
separate, that the state must intrude and exert control everywhere and
over every aspect of our lives, and therefore that the church must
vanish.
As
such reasoning makes clear, today’s Leftists are morally unfit to lick
Jefferson’s boots, much less to quote this founding father of our
liberties to advance a socialist agenda that Jefferson would despise
and oppose with every fiber of his being. Jefferson’s
and Ben Franklin’s motto, after all, was “Rebellion to Tyrants is
Obedience to God,” a phrase that almost became part of America’s Great Seal.
Today’s
religious war, launched by the Left, masquerades as a struggle to
preserve religious liberty by exorcising religion from every government
building, budget expenditure, public school commencement speech and
other activity. This is a lie.
We in truth are caught in a crossfire – oops,
delete the word “cross” with its Christian implications – between two
religions. The
Judeo-Christian faith of the Bible is under attack by the Humanist
“religion” of the Left that aims to uproot and replace it, just as was
attempted by Hitler’s National Socialist Germany, by the late Marxist
Soviet Union, and today by Communist China.
The central point of this column is that
secular socialism in America inherently violates the First Amendment. It does so by relentlessly enlarging
government. Because
every new inch of cultural and social ground invaded by government is
thereafter purged of religion, every incremental expansion of
government violates the religious “free exercise” right of those whose
lives it invades.
All
secular socialism is therefore by its very nature a rolling juggernaut
of genocide against the worshippers of every other religion.
And all socialism is therefore evil and an
enemy of human rights, whether it is the socialism of Hitler or of
Hillary.
In
recent decades the courts (most of whose current judges have been
appointed by Leftists) have tended to rule that where government
advances religion must retreat in the name of separation of church and
state.
What
the courts should rule, instead, is that, because of the inherent
supremacy of the First Amendment, government should be prohibited from
advancing its own Establishment of Socialist Religion, its sphere of
power and influence, any further. Wherever government advances, it
creates a de facto “Establishment of Religion,” a humanist state
“church” from which all other faiths are forcibly excluded.
Non-statist
religions should not be required to retreat or yield in the face of
expanding government. The state religion that worships ever-larger
government should be prohibited by the courts from such expansion in
the name of religious liberty.